Public-private partnerships saved Indianapolis but can they save Detroit?

Next American City says that Indianapolis and Detroit were pretty much in the same boat 30 years ago... but they aren't anymore. Indianapolis has prospered while Detroit has, well, struggled. One reason the two cities forked and went different directions may be attributed to Detroit's lack of public-private partnerships. Now that attitudes and Detroit leadership may be changing, are PPPs the way to go?

Excerpt:

The mood toward public-private partnerships in Michigan does seem to be changing. The state held its inaugural PPP summit in September 2008. Attendees at the Detroit meeting included representatives from the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 324 and private-equity firm Macquarie Capital. And at the end of last year, Michigan set up its first office of public-private partnerships.

With the country in recession, property taxes declining, and increased stresses on public-sector programming, PPPs are going to become that much more important, says Tammy Carnrike, COO of the Detroit Regional Chamber, an organization devoted to developing southeast Michigan’s economy. So far, the state has benefited from deals advanced by local municipalities, many related to the development of alternative energies. These include an additional 1,054 acres of land for the Michigan Department of National Resources, the result of an agreement between the Conservation Fund and Wisconsin-based utility We Energies; Mascoma Corporation’s construction of an ethanol plant; and an initiative to replace fluorescent lights in the Escanaba State Office Building with energy-saving LED lamps. 

Read the entire article here.
Enjoy this story? Sign up for free solutions-based reporting in your inbox each week.