Over in Europe they have something called allotments. They are
basically little bits of land, given to residents to grow and care for.
It's wildly successful and has proved to not only fill in vacant land
but also provide healthy organic food in urban areas. Why couldn't this
model work in Detroit?
Excerpt:
As I read recent Free Press stories about the increasing number of
abandoned properties and vacant lots in Detroit and pondered a story I
did months ago about pheasant hunters who train their dogs in parts of
Detroit that are reverting to wildlands, I wondered why Detroit
couldn't establish allotments for its residents?
I know someone has proposed creating commercial truck gardens in that
area, but why should publicly owned land benefit a handful of
businesses when it could provide a fantastic opportunity for thousands
to get the health and economic benefits of growing fresh vegetables and
flowers and the enjoyment and satisfaction doing it?
When cities all over America squander public funds to subsidize
millionaires who build stadiums and other structures that fatten the
pocketbooks of the builders and the campaign coffers of the political
vultures who help them, it's a question worth asking.
It would be easy to start an allotment pilot program, with the city
doing the initial fencing and lot-clearing and turning the plots over
to gardeners.
An allotment half the size of a city lot could grow enough produce for
several families to enjoy fresh corn, tomatoes and a host of other
edibles at a far lower cost than buying them in a market. And I suspect
a lot of Detroiters would get enormous personal satisfaction from
growing food, along with flowers and other ornamental plants.
Read the entire article
here.
Enjoy this story?
Sign up for free solutions-based reporting in your inbox each week.