In search of alternatives to urban sprawl

 

 

 

 

According to planner Richard Carlisle of Carlisle/Wortman Associates, the Great Recession “did for sprawl what planners have not been able to do,” slowing or halting countless new developments. But recent signs show that sprawl is creeping back into Metro Detroit. 

 

This year’s U.S. Census Bureau estimates show a slight drop in Detroit’s population, while outer-ring suburbs like Macomb Township display the highest population growth in the metro area. Recent studies have ranked Detroit the 12th most sprawling metro area in the country, and one of the fastest sprawling.

Despite these trends, Cox suspects that “the tide has turned” on sprawl. He notes that suburban housing is currently overbuilt, while two groups at opposite ends of the age scale—millennials and baby boomers—are increasingly losing interest in the suburban lifestyle. 

 

Carlisle notes an “amazing coalescence” of interest in urban living in denser developments. That arrangement appeals to millennials who have less money to spend on a traditional larger home as well as boomers who no longer want the responsibility of maintaining such a home. Meanwhile, both groups are increasingly moving towards a less auto-dependent lifestyle. He says the local market still has a long way to go in addressing those shifts, however, and Cox agrees.

“The biggest city in the state still hasn’t yet fully responded to the trend for more walkable urban placemaking,” says Carlisle. “The pressure is now on, and the timing couldn’t be better.”

Investing in downtowns

City planners have debated for years on how to address sprawl.

As far as national models go, Beyea says the oft-cited Portland Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) is the “poster child” for sprawl mitigation. The UGB is a literal line in the sand separating rural, low-density areas from urban, high-density ones. State legislation signed in 1973 required every Oregon city to establish a UGB, but Portland’s has been particularly notable for the way it’s densified and transformed the state’s largest city.

“They’ve been able to have the critical mass necessary for light rail and vibrant entrepreneurship, in terms of new businesses and location of housing,” Beyea says. “This urban service area seems to be a concept that has played out well in both larger and smaller communities as a way to curb sprawl.”

It may be too late (and likely politically untenable) to draw a line limiting urban development in Metro Detroit. But building up a dense urban core is still very much a viable solution, and one that’s already shown success. Downtown Detroit, of course, has seen considerable revitalization in recent years, with businesses and mostly higher-density housing proliferating.

Cox says that’s been driven largely by businesses like Compuware and Quicken Loans making the move downtown. But for the city’s next step, he’s envisioning a much broader transformation driven by municipal policy. He notes that the city has numerous neighborhoods, from Mexicantown to the Livernois-McNichols area, that have had walkable Main Street-style communities in the past and could again.

“We have all of the infrastructures to create a different option, as well as the authenticity of the history of these neighborhoods and institutions that remain,” he says.

Cox says those neighborhoods could become an attractive “antithesis” to the suburbs, guided by a placemaking plan that breaks down to three basic steps: removing blighted structures, rehabilitating existing housing stock and “greening everything else.” He envisions what he describes as “20-minute neighborhoods” for Detroit, where all basic amenities are within a 20-minute walking distance.

“In the end, it was land use and zoning that created the suburbs,” he says. “It’s going to be land use and zoning that reshape this kind of urban, walkable place that Detroit’s neighborhoods can be again.”

A focus on developing walkable Main Street communities has also been a part of the playbook in some suburban communities. The Main Street Oakland County program has contributed to the revitalization of the county’s traditional downtowns. The program claims to have attracted more than $700 million in public and private reinvestment over the past 15 years in 21 downtown communities.

One of the earliest communities to embrace its downtown was the City of Birmingham. The city undertook a unique overhaul of zoning regulations, starting with a 1996 master plan which provided for the implementation of a form-based code, the first of its kind in Michigan and one of the first in the United States. The code jettisons traditional zoning regulations, which focus on building usage, to instead emphasize the “form” of a building: its placement, scale, massing, and design.

Birmingham planning director Jana Ecker notes that Birmingham’s form-based code has helped to preserve and revitalize the city’s historic downtown, but it’s also helped to transform areas that didn’t necessarily have such a pre-existing appeal. The 2007 adoption of a form-based code in the city’s Triangle District has replaced urban sprawl-style surface parking lots and strip malls with more attractive mixed-use developments. Ecker says a form-based code is “absolutely” viable for any community.

“I think a form-based code approach forces you to look more at the individual approach on the street and to look at how and where the buildings are placed and how it affects the type of environment,” Ecker says. “Places with a form-based code are much more likely to be successful, vibrant places where people want to be and want to get out of their car and walk, rather than just drive through.”

Other experiments in fighting sprawl

Revitalizing and densifying downtowns isn’t the only solution metro-area communities have tried to the address sprawl. Some have had success with programs that work to preserve undeveloped land that surrounds sprawling areas. The preeminent such effort in Southeast Michigan is Ann Arbor’s greenbelt program, which has purchased the development rights to 49 parcels of land totaling 4,600 acres over the past 12 years. The program is funded in part by a 30-year, 0.5-mill tax levy that Ann Arbor voters approved in 2003.

The program preserves existing farmland and other green spaces as conservation easements, allowing current landowners to maintain the properties as they usually do while prohibiting further development on the parcels in perpetuity. Thornton says the city is working hard to build up blocks of greenbelt parcels measuring 1,000 acres or more, creating green corridors around sprawling areas.

“We are getting there, but there’s obviously a lot more work to do because there’s still some development pressure,” she says.

Another possibility lies in “retrofitting” existing sprawling developments. Consider Farmington’s Sundquist Pavilion, a 0.75-acre park and community event space that was once a strip mall parking lot. Since its opening in 2005, the pavilion has become a community gathering place that hosts public concerts and festivals, a weekly farmers market, and private events.

Farmington Downtown Development Authority executive director Annette Knowles says projects as large-scale as the pavilion can be costly, but the city is considering redeveloping other sites to make more “pocket-sized” event centers in the future.

“You have to balance out infrastructure with opportunities to just relax and unplug from buildings and parking lots and things like that,” Knowles says. “You can’t just have building stock and nothing else by it.”

Working as a region is a must

Carlisle says he expects market demand from millennials and baby boomers will drive a shift away from sprawl, with little interference needed at the policy level. But from a public infrastructure standpoint, he says the region needs to establish a comprehensive transit system to serve denser urban neighborhoods and their car-independent residents.

“At some point in time we have to begin to understand that there’s going to be a whole generation of people that either don’t want to or will not be able to own a car,” he says. “Frankly, that’s going to cross generations.”

UPDATED 8/3/16 A scuttling of a rare opportunity to advance a transit solution may have been narrowly averted this week. County executives in Macomb and Oakland counties had put forth objections to the funding and governance structure of the Regional Transit Authority of Southeast Michigan‘s proposed master plan. The plan had been in development since 2012 and was set to go before voters in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb and Washtenaw counties this November, pending approval by the RTA board. A vote last week failed, with representatives from Oakland and Macomb voting “No.” A last-minute compromise may yet send the measure to the ballot, pending a vote by the RTA Thursday.

In the meantime, a project to widen I-75 in Oakland County is expected to begin this summer.

Beyea says metro-area communities will need to work together to turn the page on urban sprawl. He says some of the groundwork for that mentality is already taking root, as some municipalities have started creating resource-sharing agreements out of financial necessity after the recession. 

 

But the next steps, Beyea says, are to create more mutually beneficial solutions between municipalities, continue to bolster Detroit’s urban core while densifying and placemaking in the suburbs and, above all, strengthen regional infrastructure.

“It’s regions, not individual municipalities, that are successful,” Beyea says. “We have pockets of success for our communities. But to raise the boat for everybody, we have to be a successful region.

This piece is part of a solutions journalism series on Metro Detroit’s regional issues, conducted in partnership with Metro Matters and guided by our Emerging Leaders Board.

This work is funded by the Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan. You can view other pieces in this series here.